The AT&T company has been subject to a lawsuit from the EEOC after unlawfully firing an VI employee.
Miguel Meléndez began working for a New Jersey based company in 2001. In 2008, he lost sight due to diabetes. He is now considered visually impaired.
AT&T took ownership of this company in 2009. In the same year, Meléndes was cleared by his doctor so that he could return to work.
Meléndes required accommodations to do his work efficiently. If these accommodations were to be filled, he would be qualified to do his work just as well as he had done from 2001-2008.
Instead of helping Meléndes, AT&T did not allow him to return to work.
Due to this misstep, they have been sued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Today, they settled the case.
AT&T will be paying Meléndes $250,000 and offering him a position in a location in Puerto Rico. There, he will receive the accommodations that comply with ADA standards.
The office will also receive annual training. I assume this relates to the treatment of disabled workers, though this wasn't specified in the article I read. There are other terms in the settlement that are unlisted in aforementioned article.
Though this is definitely better than nothing, I do wonder how convenient a move to Puerto Rico will be. I admit that I don't know a good lot about this case at this time, so I suppose this may not be a concern to the parties directly involved, but I wonder.
Also, though these "training" sessions will likely be good for the workers that receive them, will they only be given in the office where Miguel works? I feel that it is necessary they work with the people who previously made the original misstep and those that were working with him at the time and may have been influenced negatively by watching this.
For those who many be wondering why he didn't just go off and find a company that would accept him, I'd like you to consider the fact that 80% of visually impaired people in the united states are unemployed. It is very difficult to find a job as a disabled person.
This trial may have not been the best or the worst for either side, but it is bringing light to an issue which we face every day in the blind community. We see ourselves and our friends discriminated against every day, and it's okay to stand up for yourself!